<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Paper 1919</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/1200/24" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/1200/24</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T19:01:31Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T19:01:31Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Indian Constitutional Reforms: First Despatch on Indian Constitutional Reforms</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/1200/25" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Montagu, Edwin</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/1200/25</id>
<updated>2019-01-04T12:18:21Z</updated>
<published>1919-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Indian Constitutional Reforms: First Despatch on Indian Constitutional Reforms
Montagu, Edwin
We have the honour to lay before you our views upon the important&#13;
questions raised in the Report on Indian conintroductory.&#13;
stitutional reforms, dated April 22,1918, by His&#13;
Excellency the Viceroy and yourself The Report itself ws.s published in India on July 8, 1918: and&#13;
you will expect us to give you as clear an&#13;
Reception of the Re- . impression as wc can of its reception: The non-&#13;
^ ' official European community some time to&#13;
form their opinions on proposals so intricate and so far-reaching. Indian&#13;
opinion declared itself more rapidly, and from the first there ensued a&#13;
clear division between the moderate and the extreme political parties.&#13;
The former declared definitely for the Report, with certain reservations ; \&#13;
the latter against it. The strongest expression of the latter view&#13;
occurred in a letter published even before iihe Report ^appeared, urging&#13;
that anything which originates with foreigners should be rejected as&#13;
violating the priflciple of self-determination. The most advanced Bengal&#13;
politicians adopted an attitude of uncompromising opposition. In Madras&#13;
the rccognised leaders of the advanced party had some difficulty in&#13;
preventing the special conference which was held to consider the&#13;
proposals from taking the same line. But the more responsible section&#13;
of the party declared that, while the proposals were disappointing and&#13;
unsatisfactory and required radical modifications before they could be&#13;
held to constitute any substantial step towards responsible government,&#13;
effort should be concentrated on obtaining such modifications rather than&#13;
.on the wholesale rejection of the scheme. The attitude of the moderate '&#13;
party, which we believe includes the ablest and most respected Indian opinion, was far more favourable to'tho Report. They welcomed its&#13;
proposals as a real and substantial step towards the progressive realisation&#13;
of responsible government in the provinces, and tho modifications&#13;
which they urged were, with .tlie exception of those affecting the&#13;
Government of India, concerned with the details rather than the essentials&#13;
of the scheme. Opinion of this sort is fairly represented by the resolutions&#13;
recorded by the majority of the non-official members of the Indian&#13;
Legislative Council, of which we attach a copy. The independent lme&#13;
adopted by the moderates had for some time a restraining influence on&#13;
the other party. '.The tendency which had at first been-apparent to flout&#13;
temperate opinion gave place to a desire for conciliation; and at the last&#13;
moment efforts were made to induce the m.oderates to attend the special&#13;
congress held at Bombay towards'the end of August to Consider the&#13;
proposals. These efforts failed, but tho abstention of.the majority of&#13;
moderates was not without effect. The leaders of the special congress&#13;
made an appeal to moderates throughout the country to rally to the&#13;
national association. There was no talk of rejecting the reform proposals.&#13;
They were still declared, as you will gather from the summary of the&#13;
resolutions which we append, to be disappointing and unsatisfactory;&#13;
but the general decision was that with somewhat radical alterations they&#13;
could be accepted as forming a substantial step towards responsible&#13;
government. The change of tone did not persuade tho moderates to_&#13;
come in, and they held a conference of their own .at Bombay early in&#13;
November. The .resolutions passed by it will be found among the&#13;
enclosures. The' last of this series of meetings was the ordinary session&#13;
of the Congress/which met at D_elhLin December. The spirit of toleration&#13;
\Vas no longer in the ascendant and in spite of all efforts to the&#13;
contrary the most radical elements of the extreme party threw over most&#13;
of their recognised leaders, and advanced claims far beyond any made at&#13;
Bombay by demanding the grant of full responsible government in the&#13;
provinces at once. We attach a copy of the resolutions passed.&#13;
3. Thus it may be said that while'the most vocal sections of Indian&#13;
Indian opinion - opinion unite in'claiming a farther advance than&#13;
• ' has been proposed in the Report, there are&#13;
between the attitude of the moderates and that of the more extreme&#13;
politicians marked differences which we shall now explain.
</summary>
<dc:date>1919-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
